Skip to main content

Am I a Generalist or a Specialist?

Playing an acoustic guitar


 Check out Guitar George, he knows all the chords
Mind, it's strictly rhythm; he doesn't wanna' make it cry or sing
Yes an old guitar is all he can afford
When he gets up under the lights to play his thing
...
We are the Sultans, We are the Sultans of Swing

Dire Straits, Sultans of Swing (1978)

A staple of classic-rock stations, Dire Straits' Sultans of Swing has this wonderful interplay between the amateurs and the experts. The song's story is set in a jazz bar, with Dire Straits laying down the music and painting themselves as the bar's titular jazz-and-more house band. Their own musical expertise is undeniable, filled with warm harmonies, smooth transitions and an ever-changing series of musical movements.

But the house band at the centre of the story does not hog all the mic time; they let others have turns, like the decidedly more amateur Guitar George.

Beyond being professionals, the musicians in Dire Straits are also clearly specialists in their instrument. Whatever their more generalist music skills, they have a deep affinity and understanding of their instrument, making the guitar sing, or jazzing the sound with a wonderful mix of percussion rhythms. 

In technology, there are of course experts and amateurs; professionals and hobbyists. I want to focus strictly on the professionals, those of us who make our living playing the Tech game.

Within the ranks of the professionals, the experts, those of us who have spent decades working in the field, our expertise can go in several directions. but the distinction between the Generalist and the Specialist in particular has always fascinated me.

Let me put my cards on the table: I am, and always have been, a Generalist.

Sure, I have long, extensive and somewhat deep experience in some technologies. Most notable would be decades of hands-on work with relational databases and object-oriented programming languages.

But my personal wiring is to go broad rather than to go deep. I see that pattern of choosing breadth over depth repeating itself in many different ways throughout my life. Many times I have honed a new skill to an intermediate level before then moving on to growing my next skill in another area of interest.

One example, echoing Guitar George, is that I learned and enjoy playing acoustic guitar, including "all the chords." I advanced enough to have moderate ability with bar chords, enough that I can appreciate the chord progression in "Sultans of Swing" and how brilliantly simple it is to move through the progression using bar chords. I can appreciate the master who came up with that. 

But I never wanted to learn to make my guitar "cry or sing." Or even gain the level of instrument mastery of the Dire Straits musicians.

Instead, I find myself drawn to my next instrument - should I pick up the bass guitar, a reasonably small lateral step from my acoustic? or should I switch to learning drums and deepening my understanding of rhythms and song structures?

I also am an ordained priest in the Anglican Church of Canada. While spiritual leadership is now just my side-gig on evenings and weekends, I remember how, as a parish priest, my responsibilities demanded a real breadth of skills, interests and abilities. Preparing for and leading a Sunday service demands a whole different mindset than hospital visitations or setting vision or leading business meetings, but all were needed in parish ministry work.

In my tech career, the first time I felt the tension between going deeper into a Specialist role or broader into a Generalist role was while working for a small, niche consulting company. I was fairly new in the industry, just a handful of years of work experience. My boss pushed hard for me to apprentice under our senior architect. It was early in the E-Commerce world and there was huge demand for people with expertise who could lead projects for our clients. I wanted to grow more as a Team Lead and learn about managing people and projects.

Years later, when looking to enhance my Senior Developer credibility, I considered raising my Stack Overflow score as a way of proving my tech expertise chops. But others, with a deeper, more specialized knowledge of a given tech stack were always faster and more accurate in their responses.

The crux in my personal development has always been that the deeper I go in a given skill, whether in tech, music, or other, the more quickly I become bored and start to look for something else, something new, to learn. 

I have always wanted to grow horizontally rather than vertically.

That is why I have had so much fun and success in my years as a Software Development / Engineering Manager. It is the most perfect mix I have found in tech for balancing my desired level of depth with a lot of breadth. It lets me surround myself with subject matter experts, people on whom I can rely and foster their specializations, while moving through my more general list of responsibilities: design leadership; coaching; planning; communicating up, down and laterally on the org chart; dealing with personalities and so much more.

A Generalist in tech, such as an engineering manager, needs a deep enough foundation in the core technologies, concepts, business goals and more. They are at their best when they know where the limits are in their understanding and are not afraid to go into a team meeting and be the one in the room with the least knowledge, but also with the ability to grasp the details quickly enough to then be the voice of the team's challenges and decisions to others.

A Specialist in tech can solve hard problems with a speed, efficiency, confidence and accuracy. They use their deep understanding of the technologies, the problem domain, the evolution of their components and modules, to push through barriers that might stymie lesser mortals.

In the coming series of meditations, I want to reflect on the Generalist, the Specialist, how and when each is most critical to a team or a company, how to manage them, and how Artificial Intelligence changes, or at least affects, the game.

Won't you join me? It promises to be a lot of fun.

But for now, "Good night, now it's time to go home ... We are the Sultans of Swing." 


Popular posts from this blog

Trigger Windows Scheduled Task from Remote Computer via Jenkins

One thing I love about working in Information Technology is the opportunity - the NEED - to constantly learn new things. If a week goes by in which I have not looked up something on StackOverflow or other message boards, I start lobbying my team for more challenges. This week, I learned the power of running " SCHTASKS.exe " from a command-line script for a remote server in a Microsoft Windows environment. If you don't know Schtasks, you can read up on it here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb736357(v=vs.85).aspx In a nutshell, it is the command-line interface for the Windows Task Scheduler, and allows you (or a system administrator) to create, change, run, query, terminate, and delete scheduled tasks on a work-station, either the local one or a remote one. Not all of the features are available in older versions. In my scenario below, this was relevant as the local computer will be a Windows 8 machine, and the remote server is, shall we ...

Abort a Git Merge or Cherry-Pick

Recently a colleague of mine used the Git Cherry-pick feature to bring one of their commits from one branch of our repository to another. They hit a somewhat complex merge conflict and, in trying to resolve all of the conflicts in the file, they got confused about what needed to be done. They came to see me with the question: can they cancel their cherry-pick and partial merge, and start over? The answer is Yes: it is possible to abort a merge or a cherry-pick Git operation. Most of the time it is not needed; with a little work and human intelligence, the merge conflicts can be resolved without too much trouble. But sometimes, in cases like my colleague faced, a more complex merge winds up confusing the developer, and they want to go back and start over. If you use git from the command-line, it’s as simple as: git cherry-pick --abort or git reset --merge On my team, about a quarter of us use Git from the command line, but most - like my colleague in this story -...

How to do Git Rebase in Eclipse

This is an abbreviated version of a fuller post about Git Rebase in Eclipse. See the longer one here : One side-effect of merging Git branches is that it leaves a Merge commit. This can create a history view something like: The clutter of parallel lines shows the life spans of those local branches, and extra commits (nine in the above screen-shot, marked by the green arrows icon). Check out this extreme-case history:  http://agentdero.cachefly.net/unethicalblogger.com/images/branch_madness.jpeg Merge Commits show all the gory details of how the code base evolved. For some teams, that’s what they want or need, all the time. Others may find it unnecessarily long and cluttered. They prefer the history to tell the bigger story, and not dwell on tiny details like every trivial Merge-commit. Git Rebase offers us 2 benefits over Git Merge: First, Rebase allows us to clean up a set of local commits before pushing them to the shared, central repository. For ...

Updating Oracle javapath symlinks on Windows

A Java-based application on my Windows 10 machine recently started prompting me to upgrade my version of Java. Since I wanted to control it myself, I declined the app's offer to upgrade for me, and downloaded and installed the latest Java 8 from Oracle. In my case, Java 1.8.0_171, 64-bit version. The upgrade went fine. But when I launched the app, it again said I needed to upgrade. Why was it still looking at the old location? I made the change using Settings, to change the JAVA_HOME environment variable to point to the location of the new upgrade. But no change, the app still insisted that I needed to upgrade. A little research into the app's execution path showed that it was using c:\ProgramData\Oracle\Java\javapath to find Java. When I looked in that folder, I found symbolic links to my old Java installation. Normally, this hidden bit of information gets updated automatically in the upgrade or installation process. I have read of cases where, when downg...

Git Reset in Eclipse

Using Git and the Eclipse IDE, you have a series of commits in your branch history, but need to back up to an earlier version. The Git Reset feature is a powerful tool with just a whiff of danger, and is accessible with just a couple clicks in Eclipse. In Eclipse, switch to the History view. In my example it shows a series of 3 changes, 3 separate committed versions of the Person file. After commit 6d5ef3e, the HEAD (shown), Index, and Working Directory all have the same version, Person 3.0.